Press Releases

business enterprise fund image

Dodgy Dragons

They aren't called Dragons for nothing! James Caan's investment practice in the den exposed

When Sharon Wright, wanted to increase the profitability of her fledgling business Talpa Products, which produced the award-winning Magnamole product, she did what many entrepreneurs dream of and walked up the famous steps in TV’s Dragons’ Den and walked back down again with a deal done and with the two dragons that she had wanted, for more money than she had asked for. Sounds perfect doesn’t it? However without the cameras, the deal became anything but perfect.

We talk to Wright about what went wrong and why the perfect deal turned so sour.
“One of the best pitches that the Dragons’ had seen” was how Theo Paphitis described 40-year-old Wright’s performance.

The media dubbed her ‘the dragon slayer’. As Sharon Wright, a single mother from Scunthorpe, walked away from the ‘lair’ with more money that she had asked for, it really was a coup.

Never in its five previous series had there been such a confident performance on the TV show for entrepreneurs. Even the most famous, and successful, investment pitch from Levi Roots and his Reggae Reggae Sauce was not as slick and self-assured as Wright.

The five panellists, Duncan Bannatyne, Peter Jones, Deborah Meaden and James Caan echoed Paphitis’ words to say her pitch was brilliant and it looked as though the £80,000 investment she had gained, £30,000 more than she had actually asked for, would propel Talpa Products, her fledgling business, into the commercial big time.

Praise all round: All five dragon’s praised Sharon on her business & pitch

Her business and the MagnaMole device came about as, after moving home, Wright watched in surprise as an engineer poked a cable through the double-skin wall using nothing more sophisticated than a metal coathanger, apparently with no idea of what lay in between. It was, she says, her ‘Eureka moment’. ‘I thought, “That’s not safe – you don’t know what’s inside that cavity”.

There could have been a mains cable inside the wall. I decided then and there that there must be a better way. And there was.’ For the next two years, Sharon worked 16-hour days developing the impressively simple MagnaMole device, which simplistically, is a plastic rod that can take a cable through cavity walls without risk of electrocution and speed up the entire installation process.

Wright was flattered that in 2008 the MagnaMole won the Diamond Award for Innovation at the British Invention Show and by 2009 she had sold 41,000 in the UK.

With her company by then valued at £350,000 and having an annual turnover of £70,000 a year she intended to spend additional investment on staff, on a new website and on printing foreign language instructions to insert in global versions of the MagnaMole.

At that point, she was surviving, as most start-ups do with one employee who worked just one day a week for the minimum wage, the additional staff that the funding would provide, one full-time to look after the day-to-day operations and another part-time to assist her with some of the admin, which mounted up whilst she was out of the office meeting potential customers.

So in February 2009 she applied to Dragons’ Den and was told she would be considered for an appearance. ‘I was really excited,’ she says.

Wright then did her homework, and following investments in the ‘ChockBox’ and the rapstrap, both of which were in a similar market to her product, the two entrepreneurial dragons that she wanted to secure were Duncan Bannatyne & James Caan.

During her pitch, Sharon asked for £50,000 in return for a 15 per cent share in her company. All five Dragons - Deborah Meaden, Theo Paphitis, Peter Jones and most important to her Cann and Bannatyne were impressed.

Wright was then put in the unexpected position of choosing between them, but Bannatyne & Caan had actually offered her £80,000 for a 22.5 per cent share of her company as they felt that she hadn’t asked for enough of a capital injection to reach the targets that she had outlined in her pitch. Given that these were the two Dragon’s she wanted, she accepted and felt like she was walking on air.

The start of the problems

A few weeks after the filming, Sharon was invited to meet the man she so admired at his London Mayfair offices.

Having made the 200-mile journey from Scunthorpe, for the pre-arranged meeting, she was told that Caan was busy. Instead, she was escorted to a local coffee shop to meet Peter Moule from the firm Electro Expo, who’s company was behind the ChockBox, and had sold a stake in his company to Caan and Bannatyne in 2000. It would be money from Electro Expo that would support her fledgling business, she learned.

Happier Times: Duncan Bannatyne & James Caan with Peter Moule

A few days later, she met Bannatyne at his offices in Darlington. This time, the Dragon had a more personal touch and introduced her to his staff, spent time with her and gave her the advice and support she was craving to grow her business.

In June, Wright received two ‘pre-contracts’ from the Dragons pledging £40,000 each. Business Matters has seen sight of Bannatyne’s contract (copy here), which is clearly in line with those discussions seeing him personally purchasing 12.5% equity for £40,000, we have not seen any similar stage documentation from Caan.

Wright then met both Caan & Bannatyne to do a photoshoot and agree and sign the final contract to tie up the investment. Both Cann & Bannatyne had contracts drawn up, but in line with standard investing protocol, all three needed to agree one standard contract, and after private discussions it is understood that Bannatyne gave in to Caan’s requests to use his ‘standard contract’ although given it’s length he did not have time to review it in any detail, but having invested together on a few deals by that point, took it to be a reflection of their agreements to date and discussions regarding Wright’s company.

The Photoshoot: The day she signed the contracts

Afterwards, when the Dragons told her they needed the contract signed, she felt she had to agree, even though she had no legal representation. ‘I was desperate for the money,’ she says. ‘When they were going through the contracts, it was all going over my head.’

Bannatyne said, that as he had only just seen the contract, he was making some assumptions regarding some of its content, but was happy to take Caan’s judgement on it, but very clearly asked Wright whether she needed a lawyer, but she foolishly chose to press ahead. ‘I thought I didn’t need to be suspicious of my business partners,’ Wright says, which in hindsight is something that she regrets and is also a lesson for anyone gaining investment in their business whether it is from a family member, friend, or famous dragon.

Wright said that at that meeting she clearly remembers saying to Caan, “Well, you’re not going to rip me off are you, because you’ve got a lot more money than me.” And I signed the contract.

It was then that she was informed, by one of James Caan’s senior management team that the £80,000 investment was, in fact, a loan that she would have to pay back.  At that point, Sharon considered pulling out of the deal, but not wishing to alarm her existing investors she decided to continue.

However Bannatyne comments that ‘it may have actually been more beneficial for Sharon if some of the investment had been regarded as a directors loan as her company owed her £150,000 that she had loaned it to get started and if it had have been capitalised the resulting dividends would have been taxed, this would not have applied to James Caan as he doesn’t pay UK tax, but it would not necessarily have been in the same terms as outlined in the agreement.’

She had kept both dragon’s up-to-date with progress on her business and Bannatyne, she said, always responded, no matter where in the world he was always replied by phone, text or email and considering how many business and charity commitments he made me feel i was important’ Wright adds.

It was only when things were going drastically wrong that alarm bells started ringing.’ The Dragons’ Den show was broadcast on July 22 and business boomed with the publicity.

Wright tells me that she was told by the BBC that their website had a record number of hits from people watching the re-run and she found herself answering 7,000 emails. Soon afterwards, she had a meeting with Caan on his own where he suggested she redesign her website using one of his contacts.

‘I finally thought I was getting the support I needed,’ she says, assuming his company would foot the bill. Instead she got an invoice from an expensive company for a sum well outside her budget, which Caan would have known and there was still no sign of the money.

She had employed more staff to cope with the extra business, yet she was unable to pay their wages. Nor could she pay her suppliers, and two of them stopped production.

Finally, in late August, the Dragons’ released a mere £4,000 from Electro Expo to help her pay costs. Over the following months she borrowed a further £22,500, making a total loan of £26,500.

Wright had also decided to not cause friction between Caan & Bannatyne and so as it was Caan’s team that had been discussing the financial arrangements of the deal she assumed that Bannatyne had full knowledge to them and was in agreement with them.

It was around this time that Sharon employed a solicitor to examine the contract drawn up by Caan’s lawyers and finally realised the enormity of her mistake. In order to obtain their 22.5 per cent stake in the company, the Dragons bought a number of shares for a nominal fee of £1 per share.

In effect, they had bought nearly a quarter of Sharon’s company for £29 with the promise of loaning Talpa up to £80,000. There would be no additional money by way of investment and there was limited access to the interest-free loan which could be reduced at any point to whatever value the Dragons chose.

Also, the contract stipulated that the £80,000 loan had to be paid back ‘as soon as the cash-flow of the company permits’. Sharon was particularly disturbed to learn that, in signing the contract, she had agreed that the two Dragons could charge a fee for their support.

She claims that in a meeting that took place in August 2009, she was told that she would by a member of Caan’s team that her company would have to pay an estimated £3,000 a month fee to them for their ‘services’, including the use of a PR company recommended by Caan.

At the same meeting, she claims she was asked to reduce her salary from £50,000 to just £12,000. Indeed, it appeared she no longer had control of her own company.

Sharon’s solicitor, Dean Dunham, pointed out that one of the Dragons would be chairman of the company and would have the casting vote in all decisions, which given the size of their investment is not normal.

It was then that Dunham set up about reversing the deal based upon ‘the worst contract that he had ever seen’ and when the full details came to light Bannatyne was said to be livid and contacted Caan and his senior management team to tell them that this was not how the deal should have been structured.

Banntyne is also said to be furious that there was to be the £3,000 fee levied on the fledgling business and that the investment had not been as it should have been with them, either directly, or indirectly through Electro Expo converting their £80,000 into equity.

This investment and equity stake would have been realized, when, and in the normal case of events, been realized by either a full-sale, or part-sale of the business at a mutually agreed date.

Bannatyne was keen to invest in Sharon alone and at the previously agreed, and never changed as far as he was concerned, terms. Where he paid £80,000 in return for 22.5% equity in her company, with no loans or service changes payable. Wright decided that at that time she couldn’t trust anyone and so declined the offer, a decision that she now regrets as she accepts that Bannatyne was the good guy.

With Bannatyne & Caan, now out of her business, Wright was having to cope personally with problems that all of the stress that the situation had put her through. She had lost interest in
confidence as a person. I didn’t know who I was or what I was going to do, and it scared me.’

This, and the fact that her company has paid back £22,000 of the £26,500 loan, might have been the end of a difficult story.

Yet, according to Sharon, it was not. She says she has received numerous calls, texts and emails from Caan and his team, since the day she was discharged.

They have said to me, “Tell the story in a positive way and we’ll support you, help you promote it.” I’ve not responded.’ Nor is it the end for the Magna–Mole. Though hampered by the partial loss of her supply chain due to the removal of credit as a direct result in cash-flow issues brought about waiting for the promised £80,000, Sharon’s business has begun a recovery and is now in profit.

She has secured contracts with B&Q and Maplins, as well as the department store Kmart, with hopefully Sears to follow in the US. Sharon has also secured a deal with a new investor giving him ten per cent of her shares for £100,000.

Taken from the business matters website dated 23rd September 2010 http://www.bmmagazine.co.uk/They-are-not-called-Dragons-for-nothing-Sharp-practice-in-the-den-exposed.958

Demand for Loans at BEF up 22% on Target

Further proof of the Gap in the Provision of Finance

We are now 6 months into our financial year and 6 months into our campaign to ‘lend a million’ for small businesses. Just to prove the demand for loans is as acute as ever we can share that we are now 22% up on where we expected to be and there is no sign of it slowing down.

A recent report by the bank of England showed that business lending was down 2.2% on last year, and last year was a bad year anyway. Despite the Government’s stated intentions it is clear that it is having no effect on the bank’s policy. If the banks are reducing their supply of finance to business what hope is there for a business led recovery.

The position of the banks is disappointing especially when people seem to have the appetite for enterprise. Unfortunately organisations like us (Community Development Finance Institutions) have limited resources and would be easily swamped. There needs to be a shift in Government policy to support alternative business finance providers like CDFI’s, who provide business support along with loans. They also need look to provide mechanisms for meeting the demand for enterprise through grass roots organisations like CDFI’s and Enterprise Agencies especially since Business Links are unlikely to be around for much longer.

Bank Lending to Small Business Down

Lening dropped by 2.2% on last year

A report in the telegraph shows that Banks are continuing to hold bank loans for small businesses. The gap in provision is greater than it was a year ago. This is based upon a report from the Bank of England that states that credit is tight and continues to be.

Lending by Government’s loan guarantee scheme falls 23pc

Business lending under the Government's Enterprise Finance Guarantee Scheme fell by 23pc

The findings prompted business groups to call for Vince Cable, the Business Secretary, to read the riot act to the high street banks and slash the cost of the Enterprise Finance Guarantee (EFG) scheme.

Cable is understood to have raised the issue with both the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) chief executive Stephen Hester and Lloyds chief executive Eric Daniels during his first meetings with both men last week as both banks were mandated to support business lending as part of their government bail outs.

High Street banks lent £472m in the six months to September under the EFG, however, only £365m was lent from September to March this year. The total number of individual loans also collapsed, falling 18pc to 3,583 in the period.

The Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) said it was concerned that during Labour’s last months in power and since the General Election, the Government had not maintained enough pressure on the banks to lend.

FSB spokesman Stephen Alambritis said: “The EFG is expensive with too many conditions and the marketing of it between September and March was poor. The ebb and flow of it depends on ministers having their eye on the banks.”

The EFG, which is aimed at businesses that need to borrow but do not have enough assets to act as security, was extended by £200m to £700m in the June Budget, a decision that was welcomed by banks and small businesses.

Stephen Pegge, from LLoyds bank, said: “Compared with the £500m limit, the lending run rate is faster than that, so we’re pleased they increased it. But there’s no truth in claims of any big slow down.”

However, Mr Alambritis said: “The extension of the guarantee must be coupled with better marketing. We think that Mark Prisk and Vince Cable should do spot checks themselves as the banks will try to bamboozle.”

He also called for the cost of the Government guarantee to be reduced, which he said was also discouraging businesses from applying.

To cover potential losses, the Government charges a premium over the lending bank’s commercial rate. This premium was 1.5pc points during 2009, but rose to 2pc from January 1.

“With base rates at 0.5pc, two points above base rates is enormous. In the context of the talk about unemployment and double dip recessions, it is important that the rate is reduced,” said Mr Alambritis.
Bank of England statistics show that in the year to April, total lending to small and medium enterprises was 3.8pc lower at £46bn in loans and £8bn of overdrafts.

Daniel Shear, corporate finance partner at BKL (London) said “I predicted in January of last year that the scheme may not be successful and unfortunately I may have been right.  The scheme replaced the old Small Firm Loan Guarantee Scheme which was not universally popular among the banks.

“If a lack of security is the only issue preventing a bank making a loan then the EFG scheme will allow the bank to make what is effectively a cashflow loan. However, banks still need to make their own commercial decision on the loan and be comfortable in making a loan that is 25 per cent unsecured.

“Too many businesses are rejected for an EFG loan because they do not have a robust business plan supported by historical financial information and reasonable forecasts indicating how the loan will be serviceable.  Those that are able to ‘sell their story’ are often ineligible for an EFG loan under the lending criteria.

“After the write-off the banks have made in recent years they are being more strict on new loans, and given that 25 per cent of an EFG loan effectively remains unsecured it is perhaps not surprising that banks’ credit teams are not willing to sanction so many EFG applications.

“Finally, with low interest rates the government premium makes the overall interest rate charged on EFG loans relatively high at the moment and some eligible businesses may decide that alternative sources of financing would be cheaper for them.”

A Business Department spokesman said lending under the EFG reflected the progress of the credit crisis. “Demand for EFG peaked as small and medium enterprises sought working capital in response to the height of the credit crunch,” he said.

Peter Ibbetson, chairman of business banking at RBS, which has lent more than 40pc of all EFG loans, said: “We have not taken our foot off the pedal. It’s an important way for us to help businesses in difficult times.”

He added: “We are still seeing reasonable demand for it, although the demand is slightly less than when the recession was really hitting businesses.

“The sense we have is that the businesses that need the EFG when the recession hit used it so it is inevitable that it has fallen off a bit.”

However, Mr Ibbetson said he expected loan demand to strengthen this year.

http://www.bmmagazine.co.uk/Lending-by-Government-Enterprise-Finance-Guarantee-scheme-falls-23pc.887

Lend A Million Campaign

Next instalment of the Wii tournament 21st July

The next Wii tournament will be at the Brewery Tap 18-24 New Station Street Leeds LS1 5DL 0113 243 4414
Starting at 5:00pm and finisheing at around 7:30pm. If you want to bring a team then that would be great opportunity to meet lawyers, accountants, consultants and advisors.
Phone Johnny Dumbrava on 01274 207211 to book your team.

We look forward to seeing you there.

Page 5 of 10 pages « First  <  3 4 5 6 7 >  Last »

Case Studies